by Ben Johnson,The White House Watch
Only in the liberal media can a weak entreaty to obey the law be considered an act of political warfare. The media have portrayed House Speaker John Boehner’s letter to Barack Obama,merely asking the president for another legal explanation for his war-by-decree in Libya,as “ratcheting up the pressure.” The New York Times correctly noted,“it is not clear if [Boehner’s Congressional] resolution and follow-up letter have any teeth.” It is actually a five-day pass to keep breaking the law.
The text of Boehner’s letter reads,“it would appear that in five days,the Administration will be in violation of the War Powers Resolution unless it asks for and receives authorization from Congress or withdraws all U.S. troops and resources from the mission.” After blasting the president’s “refusal to comply with the basic tenets of the War Powers Resolution,” Boehner invokes the Constitution – but not the section many legal scholars may have expected. Instead of noting what our Founding document has to say about the power to declare war,Boehner writes:“The Constitution requires the President to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’ and one of those laws is the War Powers Resolution,which requires an approving action by Congress or withdrawal within 90 days from the notification of a military operation.”
There are only four problems with Boehner’s letter:it’s wrong on the Constitution,it’s wrong on the law,it offers no consequences for wrongdoing,and it came 30 days too late. Obama is in violation of the War Powers Resolution right now.
The Constitution or Cronyism?
Democratic Congressman Brad Sherman of California gave a more accurate assessment nearly a month ago when he said Obama is “shredding the Constitution.” Today,the House passed an amendment Sherman authored to….