Ben Johnson,The White House Watch
A deluded Christian leader predicted the world would end on May 21,but this weekend’s Norwegian terrorist attack has raptured the liberal media into the third Heaven. They exulted that the terrorist,who killed at least 76 people,is a “Christian fundamentalist”and possible “neo-Nazi” with (they repeatedly pointed out) blue eyes. Anders Behring Breivik appears to be precisely the white conservative the Department of Homeland Security has spent two years warning us is the “most likely source of terrorism”in the United States. There’s just one problem:Breivik states he does “not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ or God,”questions “[i]f there is a God,”defines Christianity as as a cultural construct to oppose Islam,favors a “secular”society,supports abortion in many circumstances,describes himself as “pro-homosexual”and “pro-Israeli,”wants to transfer child-rearing from the family to the government,hates Adolf Hitler,belongs to the Freemasons,supports a “New World Order,”wants to rebuild the Jerusalem Temple…and has a soft spot for breakdancing.
As he was about to unleash his deadly assault,Anders Behring Breivik released his 1,500-word manifesto 2083 —A European Declaration of Independence under the pen name Andrew Berwick. Unlike many of the mass media “journalists,”this author has read nearly all of it. It paints a picture of Breivik that shatters the mainstream media template of an angry Christian yokel.
The Rise of the “Christian-Atheist”and “Christian-Agnostic”
To begin with,he does not appear to be a Christian. He insists atheists and agnostics “are cultural conservative Christians without even knowing it.”He then asks:
So what is the difference between cultural Christians and religious Christians?
If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural,social,identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian (p. 1307).
The Cross,he writes,“should serve as the uniting symbol for all Europeans whether they are agnostics or atheists”(p. 1307).
To facilitate the new Crusades,Breivik and a group of others refounded the Knights Templar in April 2002. On page 817 of his tome,he notes that the 12 founding members included an “English Christian atheist,”a “German Christian atheist,”a “Russian Christian atheist,”a “Dutch Christian agnostic,”and three people with no religious description. That is,seven of the 12 founders do not feign any religion whatsoever.
The Knights’ranks would be open to atheist recruits,whom he said would fight for secularism:
Being a Christian can mean many things;That you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage….European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “Christian fundamentalist theocracy”(everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want).
So no,you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian atheist. (pp. 1361-2,Emphases in original).
For a “Christian fundamentalist,”Breivik skirted the definition of Christianity and diminished the importance of its practice. When describing his preparations for the attack he wrote,“If praying will act as an additional mental boost/soothing it is the pragmatical thing to do. I guess I will find out…If there is a God I will be allowed to enter Heaven as all other martyrs for the Church in the past”(p. 1345).
However,he seems on thin ice for this belief. On page 1324,he introduces his “Christian justification of the struggle.”It consists of one verse from the Book of Psalms. In a later section on “self-defense”(pp. 1327-1334),he cites a series of Old Testament passages —and the verse in which Christ tells St. Peter to put his sword away,“for all those who take the sword shall perish by the sword”(St. Matthew 26:52-54).
Paganism may have played a greater motivating role than the religion of the Crucified One. Breivik writes,“Odinism is still and will always be an important part of my culture and identity”(p. 1360).
Despite his lack of faith,he has no timidity in planning to transform Christianity —or kill its leaders. Finding the faith of his fathers too passive and “suicidal,”he and his fellow knights “will rejuvenate”the Christian Church “by implementing our reforms”(p. 1307). The Church will always take a second place to secular learning,saying it is “essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings.”Later he says,since Pope Benedict XVI has not called for military coups in Europe,he “has abandoned Christianity”and is “a cowardly,incompetent,corrupt,and illegitimate pope…we will take the necessary steps to eradicate the corruption which is continuing to plague the Church”(p. 1327).
“Church leaders”who disagree with the Knights are listed as “Class B traitors”who will incur the “death penalty and expropriation of property/funds,”although he graciously allows,“Punishment can be reduced under certain circumstances.”He courteously tallied the exact number of Class A and B traitors in each EU country from the most (Germany at 82,820) to the least (Malta at 417).
Although he intends to kill at least some of the Church’s leaders,he does not target many of the issues held as vital by most Christians.
Pro-Gay,Pro-Abortion,Anti-Family “Christian Fundamentalism”?
Traditional Christianity opposes abortion,promiscuous sexual activity,and the homosexual agenda,but Breivik finds himself on the other side of these cultural issues. In an online post,he wrote,“we have to ensure that we influence other culturally conservatives to take our anti-racist[,] pro-homosexual,pro-Israeli line of thought.”Elsewhere,he says we must “Support Israel’s fight against Jihad”(p. 1243).
He assures us the sexual revolution “is not a Marxist concept but rather a liberal one,”and thus one we have to preserve. “So how do we preach chastity to a mob that wants unlimited access to free sex? The answer is that we don’t.”He added it was important not to “ram a puritan and deeply conservative way of life down the throat of everyone”(pp. 1168-9). Instead,he envisions the development of autonomous “liberal zones”similar to Las Vegas,where anything goes.
He allows for abortion ‘in the case of rape…or if the baby has mental or physical disabilities. The liberals zones may be exempt [from] this law”(p. 1179). A “ban on abortion,”he writes,would “strip women or basic rights”(p. 1181).
Many of Christianity’s cultural opponents have sought to redefine marriage. So does Breivik. “Marriage must be based on a specific agreement between a man and a woman who creates [sic.] an advanced pact which must have a limited validity of at least 20 years”(pp. 1176). These contracts fit into his plan to transfer child-rearing from the family to the State.
“Outsource Breeding”for the State
Similar to other totalitarians,Breivik the alleged “Christian fundamentalist”would destroy the family. He proposes what he calls “outsource breeding”by women in “low cost countries,”who would produce babies on demand. The parents could select sex traits via “reprogenics”(pp. 1192-4). Once the engineered babies arrive on shore,Breivik would have “the state,or state funded institutions take on the fostering [of] these children.”This will begin with “kindergarden boarding school”at “age 0,”where they will be “assigned a specific surname,”and continue through college at age 25 (p. 1182-3). The “parents”assigned to them would follow them for at least 25 years and be paid based on “performance”(p. 1196). To ease matters,schooling will be replaced with a “Brain-Computer Interface,”which loads “15-30 years”of learning “from an external device to the brain”(p. 1199).
If Breivik values few Christian conservative issues,he has strong convictions that there are too many people on earth —approximately three billion too many.
Anders Breivik:The John Holdren of Terrorism
Breivik wrote that “Overconsumption,pollution,and overpopulation are the three problems that threaten the future of life on earth”while calling for “global population control”(p. 1200-1). “We should create population capacity guidelines for continents or countries. If starvation threatens the countries who have failed to follow our guidelines,we should not support them…or send them any kind of aid.”“Our planet should not exceed 3 billion individuals so radical policies will have to be implemented”(p. 1202).
An environmentalist campaign of population control hardly sounds Christian or fundamentalist. However,it closely echoes the writings of current Science Czar John P. Holdren,who envisioned a similar scheme in his book Ecoscience.
Breivik appears to be an economic centrist. He wrote,“To my left you will find a socialist,to my right you will find a social democrat”(p. 1355). He favors the “development of alternative energy”to “save the environment”(p. 1199) and argues it is “essential”that “national states have a controlling stake in”multinational corporations (p. 1196).
The Breakdancing Zionist “Neo-Nazi”
The media intimated Breivik may be a neo-Nazi,based on his concern for Europe and,apparently,his blue eyes….