Video: The UN Considers Gun Regulation Treaty

43 comments to Video: The UN Considers Gun Regulation Treaty

  • Joseph Dakin

    They can consider all they want. There will be a lot of dead bodies before they ever suceed getting the guns from the American people, cause that would be there next step. What we do in this country is none of their business. Period,

    • susanm

      1ST. OF ALL, I DON'T RECALL OTHER NATON HAS THE RIGHT TO TELL ''WE THE PEOPLE'' WHAT WE MUST DO, DO YOU THINK WE WILL TURN IN GUNS…..NO WE WON'T…I DON'T OWN A GUN, NEVER SHOT A GUN, BUT DAMN IT I'LL LEARN HOW TO SHUT A GUN, THATS MY RIGHT, NOT THE U.N. RIGHT…..WORLD ORDER COMING SOON, THATS WHEN THEY THE U.N. GET OUR GUNS…..

  • SammysDad

    This is a treaty and needs to be passed as such by congress. First of all, congress will not pass it. Secondly, the UN has no authority here, in fact, should be eliminated as a legitimate body and told to go elsewhere. Thirdly, there are so many countries who hate our freedom and liberties that they would vote for this just to vote against America and not on the merits of such treaty. It is being presented as a way to track international traffic of guns from the point of manufacture which will be impossible to initiate and follow up. Clearly, this is an end run of America's 2nd amendment, period.

  • Hillery Clinton is behind this Gun Grab and using the U.N. to take away our rights to bare Arms and our Constitutional rights

  • Mr Peepers

    The dummy-craps will try any means to wreck this Great nation….!!! The UN can pack up and go home,,,!!! Real Americans will NOT stand for any foreign morons in our business…!!! Wake Up America……VOTE….!!!

  • S Rubicon

    First, I am gratified the Fox people had the guts to show this. Second, the UN Treaty is a quicksand type document. Even if it was incidental to our Second Amendment right, once the treaty is in place, all updates & revisions to it become the sole responsibility & right of, the United Nations. In short, once you sign on, you get the original treaty & all changes "they" decide to make to it.
    Why does an American president think he can sign away our constitutional rights? If this was what our founders wanted, then why create a constitution at all since all rights would then be open to choices each president may make. The rights are ours, and they are individual as well as collective rights. They were ours 'before' this nation was founded. All we did was create a government to protect those rights, not sign them away by treaty with an anti-American cabal of international tyrants, despots, fanatical religious nuts, and the greedy seeking wealth & power.

  • S Rubicon

    Today at the United Nations, the Islamic Bloc is now running the UN because they have a sheer number of states (18 I think). So true democracy by the majority of numbers, or MOB rule, is shown as the fool's errand our founders knew it would be. That is why we have a constitutional republic, with elected representation.
    I hate the idea Obama may sign this because once he does, it lingers on a shelf for the day we stupidly elect more anti-gunner Senators (Democrats mostly), who can resurrect the treaty and even though the next president may not agree, make the treaty American law by their ratification. Treaties sitting on shelves should never be allowed in America. If a president does or does not sign it matters not.

  • S Rubicon

    If the Senate does not ratify a presidential signature, then our law should state the treaty is totally rejected & only if it is resubmitted at a later date can it be considered.
    Why would we allow politicians to sign away ANY of our rights? This is not about just the Second Amendment, this is about all of our rights since if this is allowed, what's to stop some socialist president from signing all sorts of anti-American treaties & enslaving us to this or another international body of despots???
    Reject it, send it back as totally rejected & lets get on with restoring our nation, not playing socialist games with our society!

  • Midnight Rider

    You Known Damn Well What They Are Up To

    You Better Cling A Liittle Tighter To Your Guns And Your Religion They Are Coming For Both.

    This Is A Call To Action
    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/20

  • BARRELL FIRST

    ITS TIME TO GO HUNTING!!! FUK THE UN, MAYBEWE SHOULD START THERE/

    NONE OF THEIR FN BUSINESS, MY CONSTITUTION SEZ I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS……
    FUK BLOWHARDBAMA, AND HIS BIOTCHES ERICA,SCAREY HAIRY, AND NECRO NANCY, THANKS TO ALL THE FUKN WELFARE RAT LIBER-TURDS FOR ELECTING THIS ''SLY'' COMMUNIST. BACK DOOR GUN CONTROL VIA THE USELESS NEGOTIATORS=U.N.

  • JIHAD'EM 2 HELL

    ARE WE THE ONLY PEOPLE IN THE USA, THAT CAN SEE THE REASON THEY ARE TRYING TO DISARM US, TO FRIKKIN OWN US.

    IT STARTS WITH THE FIRST SUBMISSION TO THEIR REQUEST/LAWS
    IT ENDS WITH THE FLAG BEING TORN DOWN AND AMERICA RENAMED

    IF YOU ARE A TRUE AMERICAN, AND BELIEVE AND LIVE THE CONSTITUTION YOU WILL NOT STAND FOR THIS CALL YOUR ELECTED REPRESENATIVES AND VOICE YOUR OPINION, JOIN THE NRA,AND DUMP THE DEMON RATS

    CLEAN THE TRASH OUTTA THE WHITE HOUSE, AND TELL THE UN TO GO FUK THEMSELVES, STAY OUTTA OUR BUSINESS!!!!!

  • buddy9210

    BACK, BACK, BACK IN THE USSR BOY, IM BACK IN THE USSR!!!!! This is the reason why Obammy and his ilk are out of control and the backboneless congress refuse to do anything about this, it is flat illegal for another country or countries to dictate to the US on anything. But since you have a bunch of closet Communists on the Dumocraptic party who HATE AMERICA AND EVERYTHING THIS COUNTRY STANDS FOR, THIS IS WHAT THE HELL YOU GET. I know how Im voting in the next Nov. elections!!! YOU BETTER BY GOD ABOVE BE CONSERVATIVE AND WILLING TO FIGHT THIS PROGRESSIVE COMMUNIST AGENDA THAT THE DUMOCRAPTIC PARTY IS DOING, or you are one of them!!! What gets me, is if you are so pissed off here then LEAVE, GO TO ONE OF THE COUNTRIES YOU ARE TRING TO MAKE AMERICA INTO AND LEAVE MINE COUNTRY ALONE!!!

  • Larry Palm

    Too hell with the UN – I will NOT give up my weapons to anybody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Geordie

    EXACTLY..MY Gun is a Collectable..Its my right to Bear Arms and Protect MY PROPERTY And FAMILY..Is OBAMA or the UN Going to do IT.??????????Yea,TRY and Take IT SUCKA.!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Mike in IL.

    Get the feeling it's time to "lock & load." Like Mel Gibson said in Braveheart "FREEDOM!"

  • dean hagerty

    The UN is a hack organization that has no world concious when it comes to right and wrong. It is one politcal garbage dump that lets people lke Irans leader and Venezualan leaders spew their dictorial rhetoric, and leaders like North Korean president spew his communistic dictorial rhetotric that any idiot knows is copletely unbeleivable. You want them to control our guns, no it should be diamantled and threw out of the US. Let the Islamic jehadist and the dictattors pay for their own propaganda. It makes me want to puke…

  • thatstoobad

    Surprise, surprise………………Immagine the millions and millions of guns that will go missing. Yeah, I used to have some guns but I have no idea what happened to them. I think it may have something to do with global warming, they must have melted.

    • michaelaxel

      If 20,000 surface to air missiles can go missing in Libya, I'm sure the Demoncrats can understand how so many guns could go missing in the US of A.

  • michaelaxel

    That the UN charade still exists is lunacy. That we participate is pathetic. That we give credence to what they do, from corrupt sub-organizations to promotion of genocide, is stupidity. That we participate, is tyranny.

  • Chip

    We waste too much time thinking about what the UN does. 90% of the time they vote against us and we pay the majority of the cost of keeping up this garbage dump. One thing I have done is put this on all my correspondence and e-mails:
    GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N.
    GET THE U.N. OUT OF THE U.S.
    Then knock the building down and build a real monument to 9/11.

  • Newt

    We have been regulating our own arms without the advice or assistance of the UN for nearly 250 years. If we had had UN regulations when the Revolutionary War was fought we would still be under Brittish control and what a mess that would be, considering the mess things are in today.
    Big government, global regulation, and global government don't mix. The World can stay out of our business when it comes to trying to control our arms.

  • Carol

    This has to do with Obama he wants to regulate the air we breathe and he has to be stopped.

  • Midnight Rider

    Shock Photos: Candidate Obama marched with New Black Panther Party in 2007
    http://www.therightscoop.com/shock-photos-candida

  • Midnight Rider

    Shock Photos: Candidate Obama marched with New Black Panther Party in 2007
    http://www.therightscoop.com/shock-photos-candida

  • Kenneth Patterson

    The UN has no rights under our constitution to regulate anything in our country and King Obama or Queen Hillary have no right to sign away our rights to the UN or anyone.

  • JIMIN PENSACOLA

    THE BEST THING CONGRESS COULD DO TODAY IS TO VOTE TO GET US OUT OF THE UNITED NATIONS. WE ARE PAYING FOR THE PEACE KEEPING
    TROOPS IN ALL RAVAGED COUTRIES……..STOP THE UN MADDNESS.

  • […] limit, to contribute more.41. Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.41. Obama attempted to move […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. Facebook 0 […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]

  • […] Obama and SecState Clinton’s efforts to bring the US under the UN’s Small Arms Treaty are direct violations of the Second Amendment of the US […]