Many friends and colleagues have asked me what I think of Paul Krugman’s New York Times Magazine article,“How did Economists get it so wrong?”
Most of all,it’s sad. Imagine this weren’t economics for a moment. Imagine this were a respected scientist turned popular writer,who says,most basically,that everything everyone has done in his field since the mid 1960s is a complete waste of time. Everything that fills its academic journals,is taught in its PhD programs,presented at its conferences,summarized in its graduate textbooks,and rewarded with the accolades a profession can bestow,including multiple Nobel prizes,is totally wrong. Instead,he calls for a return to the eternal verities of a rather convoluted book written in the 1930s,as taught to our author in his undergraduate introductory courses. If a scientist,he might be an AIDS-HIV disbeliever,a creationist,a stalwart that maybe continents don’t move after all.
It gets worse. Krugman hints at dark conspiracies,claiming “dissenters are marginalized.” Most of the article is just a calumnious personal attack on an ever-growing enemies list,which now includes “new Keynesians” such as Olivier Blanchard and Greg Mankiw. Rather than source professional writing,he plays gotcha with out-of-context second-hand quotes from media interviews. He makes stuff up,boldly putting words in people’s mouths that run contrary to their written opinions. Even this isn’t enough:he adds cartoons to try to make his “enemies” look silly,and puts them in false and embarrassing situations. He accuses us of adopting ideas for pay,selling out for “sabbaticals at the Hoover institution” and fat “Wall street paychecks.” It sounds a bit paranoid.
It’s annoying to the victims,but we’re big boys and girls. It’s a disservice to New York Times readers. They depend on Krugman to read real academic literature and digest it,and they get this attack instead. And it’s ineffective. Any astute reader knows that personal attacks and innuendo mean the author has run out of ideas.
That’s the biggest and saddest news of this piece:Paul Krugman has no interesting ideas whatsoever about what caused our current financial and economic problems,what policies might have prevented it,or what might help us in the future,and he has no contact with people who do. “Irrationality” and advice to spend like a drunken sailor are pretty superficial compared to all the fascinating things economists are writing about it these days.
- Hot Flash From Paul Krugman:Obamanomics Is Toast Paul Krugman —who shares the distinction of being a…
- Paul Krugman,Comic Genius The other day New York Times columnist (and Nobel Laureate,…