A story this week in a World Net Daily opinion piece by former Republican U.S. Senate Candidate for Alaska,Joe Miller,has received huge attention from the blogosphere. I have spent some time on the telephone with Mr. Miller and want to pass on the new information clarified by him and other sources. The bottom line is,Russia has not ratified the proposed treaty thus,the US Senate’s 1990 consent to it can be withdrawn. Information about the Alaskan legislature’s attempt to redeem land they believe belongs to Alaska is at the bottom of this article. For reference,my original article is here at MaggiesNotebook.com.
The purported Agreement for the “island giveaway” was and is not a ratified treaty according to the public record. The official name (as shown on the document) is Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the maritime boundary,1 June 1990. However,you’ll see below that the U.S. State Department in 2009 refers to it as a Treaty.
Before going farther,it’s important to note the reason this Agreement has been brought forward at this time,with accusations following that this is ‘nothing,’ not important…even that the agreement is a myth. The Agreement exists,signed by a U.S. Secretary of State James Baker in 1990 and ratified by Congress in June 1990,and signed by President G. H. W. Bush. Russia has not signed on,originally declaring that they would receive too little from it.
Secondly,it is important to know that the Agreement was negotiated completely in secret as far as we know. It began with Henry Kissinger when he was Secretary of State under President Gerald Ford. Ford left office in 1977. The U.S. ratification didn’t happen until June 1,1990 under President G. H. W. Bush. ‘Ratification’ does not mean that Congress created legislation. It means that an ‘agent’ presented the language and Congress ‘ratified’ (consented to) it.
Today,there are those in U.S. political circles,and especially in Alaska,who want the Agreement to be declared null and void,by whatever action it takes for the U.S. Congress to do so. Efforts are in the works to try to make that happen,so that is why these islands,whether 5 or 7 or 8,are being discussed.
Read More at joemiller.us By Maggie Thornton,Joe Miller
- Obama’s Giveaway:Oil-Rich Islands To Russia The Obama administration,despite the nation’s economic woes,effectively killed…
- Newsweek Seriously Asks:‘Was Russia Better Off Red?’ Proving yet again how out of touch the publication can…