Will We Ever Know The True Cause Of Andrew Breitbart’s Death?

The news yesterday has been replete with the explanation that conservative media mogul Andrew Breitbart’s death was the result of “natural causes.” How can that possibly be?” An announcement on his website reads in part, “Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes shortly after midnight this morning in Los Angeles. We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.”

In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)

 Will we ever know the true cause of Andrew Breitbarts Death?Photo: Courtesy Big Government

He began his meteoric rise as the counter force to the media cover-ups and government lies constantly bombarding us by a left leaning media. He became a major voice of the conservative movement that was helping to reshape our country.  Brietbart began his career as a citizen journalist at The Drudge Report before launching his own series of websites to expose media bias. He created a platform for citizen journalists to bypass the traditional media and break the stories that they tried to hide.  They include Breitbart.tv (citizen journalism and news clips), Big Government (corruption in American politics), Big Journalism (media bias), Big Hollywood (bias in the entertainment industry), and Big Peace (foreign policy and world events).

Of course he had a back up plan; Breitbart‘s Tapes of Obama’s College Years to Be Released in a week

Let’s discuss death by natural causes. As mentioned above, yesterday’s media, likely in haste to get the story of his untimely death in print and television as soon as possible, said that the cause of death was from “natural causes,” when factually no cause had been determined.

The Los Angeles Coroner said via e-mail Thursday morning, at 8:54 a.m. PST, that Andrew Breitbart’s cause of death had not yet been determined pending the examination of his body. Craig R. Harvey, chief coroner investigator and chief of operations for the Los Angeles Coroner’s Office, confirmed Andrew Breitbart’s time of death as being 12:19 a.m. Thursday at UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles. He went on to offer the following short comment via e-mail: “Body not yet examined. No final cause of death yet established by the Coroner.”  An autopsy is planned for today, but the Los Angeles Police Department said it is not investigating the circumstances of his death. Isn’t this a bit odd? No mention has been made that this investigation by the police happened by normal investigative protocol.

According to the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) Manual for medical examiner and coroners handbook on death registration, natural death is defined as ‘‘due solely or nearly totally to disease and/or the aging process.’’ It’s fair to say that at the age of 43, age would not have been a significant factor.

ABC reported yesterday, in a story for the AP, that Andrew Brietbart suffered from heart problems.  The AP report said nothing concerning a previous heart attack, how long he had heart disease, what type, and it is at this point the allegation remains unsubstantiated by additional corroborating information from credible sources. Was there a familial history of heart disease?

In a very short time, Brietbart became a legend. He was a one-man powerhouse who changed the way we received the news. Recently Breitbart had publicly denounced the mainstream media’s performance in vetting Barack Obama for the Presidency in 2008. As noted on Townhall.com Andrew Breitbart recently vowed to make sure such a travesty did not happen again in 2012.

It’s entirely possible that natural causes may have resulted in his death. It’s also possible that his death could have been caused by covert unnatural causes.  I’m not proposing a conspiracy here; I’m proposing a theory, resting on a number of serious questions with no answers at this point.

What if sinister forces had arranged the death of Andrew Breitbart? Could he have become a significant risk to the Obama administration that Obama’s handlers might have deemed his continued presence and reach a threat that must be silenced?

(Editor’s Note: Interestingly, at yesterday’s Cold Case Posse Press Conference, Jerome Corsi pointed out that Andrew Breibart’s Last Interview Was With Sheriff Joe Arpaio, The Night Before)

Could he have been ready to unleash another bombshell?  Remember his speech at C-PAC where he admonished that he had the videos of Obama’s college years and this time he would be vetted? Time will tell.  Where are those videos now? Will they ever be seen? Breitbart’s focus had been of finding the truth and exposing the lies and corruption of the current administration.

It wasn’t just the administration he continually exposed; Andrew Brietbart took an in your face approach in confronting the “Occupy Wall Street” movement and derided the participants for their cluelessness.

On one occasion, he crossed the line of a mob protesting its pro union cause and challenged the sign holders to explain what was on their signs. They couldn’t, so he began moving to the center of this group of cowards resulting in their moving away from him (as if Moses had once again appeared to part the Red Sea.)  Finally, as they were leaving, one participant slurred an epithet about Andrew’s sexual preferences, to which he laughed at the kid and told him he was being so politically correct and insensitive.

Remember the James O’Keefe videos on ACORN? That was Andrew Breitbart. He helped James O’Keefe and his friend Hannah Giles as they went walking in portraying a pimp and a prostitute looking for ways to scam the system, and there was ACORN telling them how to do it. All caught on video tape, it caused ACORN to “theoretically shut down,” while they changed their names and came back to life morphed as a number of separate organizations. These groups are the result of community organizing still using our tax dollars “to help get out the vote” even if fraudulent applications as well as the dead were counted among Obama’s supporters.

Breitbart exposed the texting of sexually explicit pictures by Anthony Weiner, a congressman who was forced to resign for putting pictures of his anatomy out on Twitter.  Weiner blamed Breitbart for displaying his body parts in text messages, alleging Mr. Breitbart hacked his computer and was involved.

At the time of his death, Breitbart was still waiting for Anthony Weiner’s apology that likely would have never been given. In the end, we are left with the saga of Weinergate and a fallen, mentally unbalanced former congressman.

In the case of former Georgia State Director of Rural Development Shirley Sherrod, who was forced to resign from her post after giving what was a racist speech, Breitbart released a heavily-edited video of her. Breitbart was again owed an apology,will not be receiving it, nor was any apology planned as Mrs. Sherrod was suing him over the incident.

Andrew spent the last hour before his death discussing his passion, politics, with marketing executive Arthur Sando at the Brentwood, a local bar. They said good-bye around 11:30 p.m., 50 minutes before Breitbart was pronounced dead by physicians at UCLA.

What was Andrew doing walking from the Brentwood to his home? It’s plausible that Breitbart’s home was  nearby, although we don’t know the exact distance. According to Sando, he had stopped in for a drink, “was on his Black Berry a lot, and hadn’t really been drinking. ”

Andrew Breitbart’s fans numbered in the millions.  Covering the issues he had since Obama came to town, he likely made a significant number of enemies. Would one of them want to see him silenced?

Talk show host Michael Savage just asked the question,  “Was Breitbart assassinated?” Savage noted that Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails,” referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn.

Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home. Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home.

Daily Caller editor-in-chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple, invited Breitbart. Breitbart said again to Carlson,  “I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama “sold in 2008.”

According to an article posted yesterday by Jared Morgan of the Brentwood Patch, “Breitbart’s Sudden Death Sparks Call for Investigation,” Journalist and film producer Dan Gifford (a Brentwood resident who writes for Breitbart’s site BigHollywood.com) said that “he and Breitbart had shared stories about death threats that they had both received.”

With some saying he may have been assassinated, the Los Angeles coroner will be reviewing his autopsy very carefully to determine the cause of death.

This reporter could go into the then-secret plans by the CIA to develop methods of causing death making it appear from “natural” causes. Heavily censored CIA documents from more than a half century ago (1952) show that the agency considered performing experiments on terminal cancer patients under the guise of “legitimate medical work.”

These inducing death methods by heart attack originally involved the use of chemicals. To avoid having these drugs found in any autopsy, they need to select special drugs to use. So, this method has limited opportunities for use. During the 1960s, the US successfully developed a radio-frequency weapon. Since then, the CIA’s assassins switched to using radio-frequency weapons to induce their victims to have heart attacks. This is because it is more convenient and can avoid the use of chemicals, which can be being detected. (Source: “Wonder Weapons” by Douglas Pasternak, US NEWS & WORLD REPORT, 7 July 1997.)

I choose not to follow this path of reasoning; in doing so, I might be accused of promoting a conspiracy when what I really have attempted to do is put forth questions on my theory that will require a serious investigation.

Of course, if Andrew Breitbart actually had a serious heart problem, then that may be shown as the cause of death by the coroner. Think about that, how difficult it would be to make contact with the coroner and suggest that he died from a heart attack or natural causes, as it would be in his best interest of all those concerned, including his own immediate safety and that of his immediate family, to do so.

Will we ever know about the true cause of Mr. Breitbart’s death?  Probably not; this is big league hardball where the truth is frequently trumped by power.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it; I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

Related posts:

  1. Shocking Video: Andrew Breitbart’s Last Interview Was With Sheriff Joe Arpaio About Obama Eligibility The news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Barack Obama’s…
  2. Nobody Can Fire Andrew Breitbart As the mainstream media synchronized their watches over the Shirley…

7 comments to Will We Ever Know The True Cause Of Andrew Breitbart’s Death?

  • Bloodless Coup

    People Are Beggining To Wonder Was Breitbart Assassinated?

    See this article on the Gulag Bound Website

    IMMEDIATE QUESTIONS Arise on Breitbart Death, Chemically Induced Heart Attacks Possible

    This article includes a video tape that decribes a dart gun that was developed by the CIA which shoots poison darts which dissolve and can cause the target to have a heart attack without leaving any evidence behind.

  • Guest

    The pig died from being a pig, period.

  • Sonja

    We will never know the truth.

    Just like we won't know the truth about all the people who died when Clinton was president!

    I will never believe Breitbart died of NATURAL CAUSES!

  • onthedot

    Yup, the release of the Obama tape on the day AB died was just a coincidence. Sounds like a bit of Chicagoland in LA.

  • snowyriver

    Breitbart was eliminated by those he was about to expose!!!