Why Obama’s Confirmed Forgeries Are Not Going Away

Barack Obama speech 12 SC 284x300 Why Obamas Confirmed Forgeries Are Not Going Away

For several years, an Orwellian-type fear of being “marginalized” held reporters and pundits back from questioning Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency. To raise an eyebrow at the bizarre secrecy of Obama was off-limits. To question whether the historic definition of “natural born citizen” applied to Obama was taboo.

The era of fear, however, is happily winding down. It will take some time for this realization to fully take hold. But make no mistake: the tables have turned.

Like it or not, the ground has shifted, and it cannot shift back. The evidence of Obama’s forgeries is not going away.

Up until this point, Mr. Obama controlled everything, including the talking points and burden of proof.

Rather than simply produce certified paper copies for state election officials and make the original available for officials to inspect in Hawaii, Obama played games with his purported birth certificate. We were told for three years that Obama’s birth certificate had been posted online in 2008 — though it turns out that it was a scant certification. In 2010, when confronted with the alarming doubts of the American people, Mr. Obama lamented to a sympathetic Brian Williams of NBC: “I can’t spend all my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead.” The following year, out of left field, on April 27, 2011, Obama “released” the elusive birth certificate by posting a now-discredited file image online.

Read More at American Thinker. By Monte Kuligowski.

Photo Credit: Dustin C. Oliver (Creative Commons)

No related posts.

Do you have $25,000 in your IRA or 401(k)? This "Loophole" in IRS Code lets you move your savings to gold ... get this NO-COST Info Guide >

4 comments to Why Obama’s Confirmed Forgeries Are Not Going Away

  • upaces88

    No, and they never will. This man has committed the greatest crime against America in our history.

  • ItsJo

    This Fraud, needs to be exposed, charged and jailed. Simply put, he cannot nor should not be given special passes for his hidden background and lying to the American people. Sheriff Joe Arpaio is being silenced by the LapDog Media
    as they are "in the tank for Obama" but they ARE complicit in his ideology of bringing down "Arrogant(his words) America. He WILL one day, hopefully soon, be brought out into the daylight, and the rest of this nation can pretend that
    it doesn't matter where he came from……well, IT DOES, and our Constitution is the Law of the land-NOT SHARIA.

  • Actually, if the Birther Lawyers bothered to use the right mechanism cases, if you will, we might have seen greater progress in the Courts, because the Supreme Court has two decisions that can unlock this issue very quickly.

    Respecting Presidents of the United States, the Supreme Court said:
    "The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States, or the prohibition of power to the States, is upon those making the claim." Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)

    That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 which covers that very issue of what are admissible birth identity documents to the COURT), – -

    Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62
    @ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
    @62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

    The using of these Court Cases has been ignored by Mario Apuzzo, and only when Orly Taitz began using it (but did not grasp how to apply it) did she even advance into the Georgia Court with the Iranian Muslim Judge Malihi, whom Valerie jarrett visited and got him to drop because Barack is a fellow Shia Muslim. Taitz has repeatedly dropped the ball in not using the above cases to spearhead her efforts to expose Obama, and has spun her wheels (i.e., not catching traction) because of it.

    The Congressional Globe, 1st session, May 30, 1866 (The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment) http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwcglink.html#a
    Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee :
    Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893

    Mr. Trumbull: The provision is, "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens." That means "subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof"… What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.

    …It cannot be said of any…who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."

    See also Leo Donofrio's 2012 Amicus Curia brief http://www.scribd.com/doc/79112841/AMICUS-BRIEF-b

    The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414
    "…the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” http://books.google.com/books?id=gGNJAAAAMAAJ&amp

    “…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was …a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.” http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack

    Barack fails to qualify as either a 14th Amendment Citizen, and most certainly fails to meet the threshold of a United States Natural Born Citizen without a US Citizen Father AND proof of a US Soil birth. The understanding of the Constitutional Term is expressed in the writings of John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 6: ‘Of Paternal Power’ §. 59, in which a child is born to the Citizen Father in the native country of his birth continuously and uninterruptedly until age 21, when he takes his place as a co-equal citizen of the same rights and stature of his father in the national and local society which he enters at that age. Without a US Citizen Father, Obama illegally holds office.

    Further, Kenyans are the first birthers. On June 27, 2004, they ran the unopposed claim that Obama was born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastand
    So if Obama wants to call birthers racists, he better remember who made the public claim to his being born in Kenya first: black Africans living in Kenya, including his step-grandmother Sarah.

    Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180 http://supreme.justia.com/us/5/137/case.html states that
    “a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and “in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land,the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned;and not the laws of the United States generally,but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,have that rank.”

    We need to VOID OUT Obama's entire illegally obtained (by fraud, etc.) Presidency; but as a first step, disqualifying the usurper Obama for election in November 2012 is (I think) an achievable goal if we can unite enough of the Republican and Independents into a unified movement.

    • Watching/waiting

      Why don't you send to Orly the section pertaining to what she should have done?

      She has a gmail address now due to so much spam.

      I would think that she would welcome any helpful and pertinent advice
      for the next go-around.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>