Attorney Larry Klayman has warned Robert Bauer,the General Council to the Democrat National Committee,that members of the “Democrat Party or state elections officials certifying Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election could become the targets of election-fraud charges.”
Klayman–the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch–bases his warning on the fact that Hawaii State Registrar Alvin Onaka refused to verify to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett “the birth facts for Barack Hussein Obama that are claimed on the birth certificate posted on the White House website…” In addition,Onaka “undeniably failed to verify that the [birth certificate] image posted at whitehouse.gov ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files.’”
On March 30th,Secretary Bennett filled out a standard request form,asking that Onaka “verify as true” that Barack Hussein Obama was born on August 4th,1961;that he was born in Honolulu,Oahu;that his mother was Stanley Ann Dunham and his father Barack Hussein Obama. Two months later,Onaka wrote back that “a birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Honolulu,Hawaii.” But the Secretary refused to verify the date of birth,the name of the mother or father,or even the gender of the baby!
Why would Onaka admit that a birth certificate is indeed on file,yet refuse to verify much of the information that certificate ostensibly contains? According to Klayman,“…the only legal reason for Onaka to not verify those facts is if he can’t legally do so.” That is,“… the record itself must not have ‘probative value.’”
And as for the long-form posted on the White House website,Klayman says,“…the only legal reason for not verifying that the posted long-form ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files’ is if it is not.” “There is no other plausible explanation.”
What does all of this mean? Klayman explains that “the only Hawaii statute rendering completed (and therefore numbered) birth certificates to be non-legally binding…applies to ALTERED or LATE birth certificates.” According to Onaka’s written response to Bennett,Obama’s birth certificate is indeed numbered. Therefore,as Onaka refused to legally verify the “facts” contained in the certificate or verify that the long-form “is a true and accurate representation of the original record,” it can only mean the Obama birth certificate is either altered or late,as defined by Hawaii statute.
Altered or late birth certificates cannot “stand on their own” as evidence of anything! They have no legally probative value and can therefore not be used as proof even of an individual’s age,never mind the natural born citizen status of a candidate for the nation’s highest office! Moreover,altered and late Hawaii birth certificates and copies have the word ALTERED or LATE prominently stamped on them. It’s altogether possible that Obama “created” his birth certificate online in order to hide such an obvious and troublesome imprint from the American public.
According to Hawaii statue,Obama could only correct the situation by presenting the totality of his birth records along with all existing corroboration to a proper judicial or administrative body. Such a body would then weigh all existing evidence according to “legal evidentiary standards.” Needless to say,Obama has no intention of following such a procedure.
Four years ago,the Democrat National Committee refused to certify that Barack Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” This year,Larry Klayman is strongly advising Democrat attorneys to disavow Obama altogether! It will be interesting to see what Robert Bauer and Co decide.
Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach
Related posts:
- Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their…
- Something Is Rotten In The Obama White House If you walk up to a barn,you might say,…
I am surprised that he was ever found to be eligible to be on the ballot since he is NOT eligible as he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen as required by our Constitution. Both parents must be US citizens at the time of the infant's birth. Congress does not know our Constitutional requirements. Shame!
All attempts over the past four years to to expose this charletin for who he really is have failed miserably. It seems,to say the least,a bit naive to assume that Larry Klayman's "advice'to democrat attorneys to disavow Obama will somehow meet with success at this point. Good luck Larry,and God speed!
WH Green Valley,AZ
His father was not a U.S. citizen. Obama's birth certificate is a moot point with regard to his eligibility,although it is very much in play with regard to possible fraud.
This charade has gone on long enough. People comming up missing,murdered,put in jail,kicked out of the military all for saying things that the imposters don't like. I hope that you,Mr. Klayman file charges against Clinton,and anybody else in any state who endorses this fraud for re-election,and I feel that Nancy Pelosi is complicit,and should be charged with fraud from the first election.
Larry Klayman is a has-been and is screaming for attention. He has all the credibility of Orly Taitz. Zip!
On the other hand,he and Orly serve an excellent function in keeping those who suffer from "Obama derangement syndrome"(ODS) pre-occupied with silliness instead of getting involved in adult discussions about fiscal policy.
Besides,Larry is going to have a tough time making a court filing against the non-existent "Democrat Party".
But hey,if that doesn't work for some reason,this business of President'Obama's homsexuality and drug use should rock the world of every ODS sufferer!
Keep up the good work Obama exposers!
The army sure didn't lose anything when they got rid of you. Now you have surfaced as a communist sympathiser. Now we know why you are an X. And an X to society as we in the free world know it.
You're showing advanced symptoms of ODS,Jim. Non-sensical name calling for anyone who defends the president is right at the top of the list.
But that's fine. This website is well-designed distraction for the ODS impaired and helps keeps them out of intelligent arguments. I hope it is rocking your world big-time!