Citizens In 15 States Demand A Peaceful Secession

United States map SC Citizens In 15 States Demand a peaceful secession

In mid-July, our staff posed the question of whether there might be a “constructive secession” by various states if Barack Obama was re-elected. Unfortunately, he has been reelected; and this hypothetical question has become a reality under the name of “peaceful secession.” Now it’s just a week past the election, and there are already citizen groups in FIFTEEN STATES asking for a peaceful secession from the United States of America.

Where this will take us and when it might reach its climax remains to be seen, but a few things are sure: There will be no peaceful secession, nor will there be secession by force of arms by any state. Nevertheless, neither of these facts preclude a “constructive secession” that would serve the ends of a “peaceful secession” perhaps even more effectively.

Simple strict adherence to administrative process could very quickly level the national “playing field” in the struggle to stop the unconstitutional onslaught from Obama.  He has purposefully exacerbated tensions between those who pull the wagon in our country and made it clear he intends to make us slaves to his regime. Now the ever-present “red tape” Obama himself swore to cut to help Sandy victims can force him to live with the consequences of his actions.

The reaction to Obama’s reelection has been faster and stronger than anyone could have predicted. The level of frustration caused by Obama’s evisceration of our way of life has skyrocketed, and there now seems to be no way to avoid a constitutional crisis.

Given its stunning rate of escalation, there is sure to be a Tenth Amendment test case heard by the Supreme Court as soon as next spring. But even that swift action will be behind the curve – by how much is the only question.

Peaceful Secession through Constructive Secession

Borrowing from civil divorce law, constructive secession could occur as states either refuse to fulfill their obligations of compliance under their compact with the federal government (which isn’t likely) or do so at a snail’s pace supported by miles of red tape, which is more likely.

There are dozens of states that have indicated they will not comply with the requirements of Obamacare. Two governors have  announced their states will not comply with changes in welfare eligibility rules dictated to them by Obama.

Can any observer be truly surprised that the “peaceful secession” movement now even includes New Jersey and Colorado? Can anyone even casually watching this kettle boil be certain the 15 States in this movement are all that will join, and that this movement has reached its high water mark?

Related posts:

  1. More Citizens Demand: Impeach Obama As more Americans face the dire state of our union…
  2. Border States Must Protect Their Legal Citizens   If I am stopped somewhere between my house and…

8 comments to Citizens In 15 States Demand A Peaceful Secession

  • JusticeMustAwaken

    It is more like 26 states now.. and counting..

    More publicity about this possible solution
    would be helpful. I think it is so new and
    not announced by the clueless media,
    that there are not yet enough signatures.

    Need to get the word out.

    • Rwolf

      Will Obama use NDAA To Arrest State Representatives and Citizens that support Secession?

      Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Secessionists on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?

      Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including Secessionists and Militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

      Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

      The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

      During the Obama Administration's recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

      NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

      You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

      Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

      Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

  • Guest

    LOL…maybe you just ought to surrender, Coach. Reality wins. You and your secessionists are trailer trash. Personally I'd be delighted to see you form your own nation, but there isn't a square mile of the US that has enough old cars in the yard, couches on the porch, and pellagra-ridden kids for you to call home. But make a national flag for yourself anyway: just fly your dirty t-shirt from a stick.

  • dan stewart

    Peaceful secession will probably not work, I fully understand the sentiment for secession. The bummer STOLE another election. Why won't the lame stream media report on the massive cheating that transpired. Answered my own question, "LAME stream media". Something must be done or the US is toast. The wimpy repubs will do nothing. I hope when 'boner' is up for reelection a better man beats the crap (vote wise) out of him.

    • Guest

      LOL…having a bad day, Dan ? You think it's gonna take violence, do you? What's your plan? Gonna shoot up a WDal-Mart?

      • Linda

        What's the matter "guest"? Too embarrassed to post a real name? Don't want to reveal an identity? So what's your problem?

        • JusticeMustAwaken

          This Guest person is such a troll. It appears on this blog and
          others, like a bad penny, one that has been tarnished by
          fungus and mold.

          It is a disaster walking.

          The sad thing is that these types of trolls have no clue
          as to what is wrong with our country and how the
          putative 'president' is on a mission to destroy
          and to ravish our liberties.

          The bright part of all this is that if the counterfeit
          emperor, who has no clothes, is finally caught
          up in a just legal system, he will be hanged,
          euthanized, or deported back to Kenya, where
          they can burn him in effigy.