Video: Former Marine Throws Down Gauntlet To Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban

Senator Dianne Feinstein’s proposed assault weapons ban does much more than ban assault weapons. It requires the government to create a massive database on all gun owners, complete with photos, fingerprints, serial numbers, and government “certification.” This of course was the route the United Kingdom and Australia took before banning all guns.

But a former Marine has thrown down the gauntlet against Feinstein (and Feinstein’s water boy, Barack Obama), penning the following letter:

From: U.S. Marines Cpl. Joshua Boston
To: Senator Dianne Feinstein,

I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.

Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012

Do you have $25,000 in your IRA or 401(k)? This "Loophole" in IRS Code lets you move your savings to gold ... get this NO-COST Info Guide >

2 comments to Video: Former Marine Throws Down Gauntlet To Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban

  • Ex-Army

    Just because one serves in the Armed Forces doesn't make one excempt from reasonable controls on assault weapons, particularly as the armed forces has very stringent controls on their weaponry. And BTW, Austrailia and Britain don't totally ban all weapons but do, very prudently, ban assault weapons and ammunition so that nut cases and paranoid "cowboys" can't go off on a rage and wipe out classrooms of children just because they've got inner demons.

    • Modzero1

      Ex_Army- News Flash for you, Australia & Britain do not have or share our constitution and our inalienable rights i.e. 2nd Amendment…Also, the second amendment was put in place to allow citizens to protect and defend against tyrannous government…Its not possible to defend against government issued AR rifles with bolt action pee shooters. And like a lot of people you miss the point completely…If staff is trained and armed in the schools these senseless shooting can be stopped in there tracks. More gun control is not the answer…and we my friend our not the Brits ar the Australians…We Are Americans…!!!

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>