Mid-20th century Feminism has taught us that women don’t need men,that we can do anything men can do from business to close combat,that taking on the worst behavior of promiscuous men is desirable,and that we can avoid the physical and emotional consequences that result. Chivalry is long since dead:Feminism declared it the relic of an oppressive patriarchal society rather than what it was:a standard that held women up in order to protect them. And they have convinced themselves that any differences between the sexes exist because they have been artificially imposed by men. Meanwhile men have been emasculated and fathers relegated to mere sperm donors.
Has anyone noticed all the heroines in our films and television shows in recent years? No longer are chivalrous men protecting vulnerable women. From Alias to La Femme Nikita to any female-centric film you can name,the women are portrayed as fighting machines (with guns),often rescuing their male counterparts. You know these films. Michelle Rodriguez plays the same exact cardboard badass in so many of them. They take down fighting man after fighting man. But this is all fiction – take it from a female black belt and Iraq War veteran. And don’t get me started on that twig LeeLee Sobieski on NYC22 playing a veteran who can take down street thugs. The reality is that even Rhonda Rousey isn’t put in the ring with male fighters.
If women could do the same things men can,there wouldn’t be separate standards for them in police work,firefighting,and the military,or as is true in some cases,lower standards for both sexes that women can pass. Most women can’t wield the fire hose,carry a 200-lb man off the battlefield,or take down a male criminal. The last example was proved just recently when a female cop was overpowered by a criminal who had been taken into custody. He stole her gun and three cops were shot.
Yes,some women are stronger than some men,but they are never stronger than strong men,and a woman without a weapon is no match for a man who wants to do her harm,even if she knows how to fight. I earned that black belt,I became a Marine,I went to the combat zone. But I also got cancer,and what happens when you can no longer physically fight? What if you don’t want to fight? How many women or moms,married or not,have time to train to become proficient fighters to be ready for that one random time the criminal comes at them in the parking lot? You need to be able to own a weapon for self-defense if you choose. You need to be able to nullify the threat before it comes down to hand-to-hand combat.
No matter how much the Feminists rail,and no matter how many times Hollywood portrays heroic fighting women,women are the weaker sex. This doesn’t mean lesser,it just means physically weaker and that’s a fact no amount of affirmative action or double standards can change. Leave it to hypocritical liberals and feminists to ignore scientific reality in favor of the brave new world they want to force into existence. You would think that girl-power philosophy would extend to empowering women to protect ourselves with any weapon available,especially after teaching us for so long that we don’t need men. But no,the hypocrisy is ubiquitous. Women don’t need men and they don’t need weapons either. Feminism thus fails women.
Existing and new gun control laws coupled with Feminist ideals just means that we all have to become fighters,whether we want to or not. A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle until a strong man decides to take advantage of her and/or her children. For 50 years now we’ve been taught that government will fill that void,but of course,the police usually come only come after a crime has been committed. And now the cop might be some chick who made it on a double standard who gets overpowered by the criminal in your home. Without a strong man to provide for and protect her,she not only must be a bread-winner,she must be a black belt – unless she can arm herself for protection. Guns are the real equalizer between the sexes.
This post was originally published Here: