People in general – and leftists specifically – have a tendency to view their own past achievements through rose-colored glasses,and many go as far as to completely rewrite history.
Bill Clinton’s autobiography all but ignored the Monica Lewinsky scandal that triggered the downfall of a morally bankrupt president. Al Gore,in addition to his steady stream of lies concerning the environment,infamously took credit for the creation of the Internet.
In the continuous orgy of self-congratulation that is American politics,an autobiography might be the only place to find a more sickening whitewash of history than accounts from sycophants in the media.
Such is the case with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s recently released tome.
Instead of the familiar “tell-all”book,Sotomayor apparently wrote a “tell-all-she-wants-us-to-know”book leaving out key experiences during her college years.
To be clear,she wrote in great lengths about her time at Princeton University;but her association with openly racist organizations and other left-wing fringe movements are conveniently absent.
She does describe her involvement in groups such as Puerto Rican organization Accion Puertorriquena and the civil rights association the Third World Center.
What the book fails to reveal,however,are the radical policies and ideologies espoused by members of those two organizations.
As co-chair of Accion Puertorriquena,Sotomayor pushed relentlessly for racial quotas in her quest for affirmative action.
Accusing Princeton of “an attempt …to relegate an important cultural sector of the population to oblivion,”she stoked backlash from campus newspaper “The Daily Princetonian”‘s editorial staff.
“Affirmative action should not mean positive efforts to reverse a historical pattern of minority under-representation at the expense of traditional standards of excellence,”the paper published at the time. [Emphasis in original.]
Her pro-minority bias seemed to morph into an anti-white bias with her involvement in the Third World Center at Princeton.
In addition to a radical agenda put forth in the group’s founding documents,Sotomayor added her own leftist fingerprint by inviting speakers such as Manuel Maldonado-Denis,who reported that the “only solution”to the U.S. “exploiting”Puerto Rico is “through the establishment of national liberation and the establishment of socialism.”
If this was her inspiration back then,is there any wonder Barack Obama chose her to sit on the highest court in the land – possessing the power to change public policy without worrying about re-election?
Perhaps most relevant to her current position of power,Sotomayor showed partiality toward minorities as a student judge in college.
After inappropriately disparaging eight students who broke into the dorm room of two gay individuals in a letter to the Daily Princetonian,Sotomayor heard the case and demanded those involved be expelled,sources familiar with the incident report.
In the end,the eight students were given two years of probation and were stigmatized with a permanent mark on their records.
Even the victims of the break-in said at the time the punishment was too severe.
While I certainly want a Supreme Court sensitive to injustice,Sotomayor’s past seems to indicate she is receptive to only the suffering of her favorite minority groups.