We stand on the brink of an illegal exercise of military power in a part of the world we have no need to be in,except that we have a president who purposefully keeps us there by suppressing our own development of energy resources and embroiling us in their internecine warfare. We could have walked away from the Middle East already and left them to their own savagery,but the president insists that we remain inextricably tied to their historical need to kill each other so that we can overpay for oil,both monetarily and with American lives. Thus,as technology enables us to break free of dependence upon Middle East oil,our president bends over backwards to ensure that never happens. What sort of leader purposefully compels his country and its people to participate in practices and policies that are detrimental to their safety and survival?
Even worse,when he can be shown to have chosen sides,his allegiance rests with terrorists and psychopaths. His affinity for Islam and its practitioners,as seen in the influence he grants them in the formation and direction of U.S. policy,is well known. Outspoken detractors of the United States and proponents of worldwide Sharia are welcome guests at the White House. They have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. They direct the content of discourse and training about who and what they are. Our blindness toward their hatred and objectives,and perhaps our administration’s shared stake in that hatred of the United States,was manifested in the obscene spectacle of a Muslim cleric insulting and damning our dead special forces troops at their own memorial service. That event was a natural consequence of the sort of brainless political correctness that pervades the left. So too was what Nidal Hasan did at Fort Hood. Such “tolerance”is a top-down phenomenon.
Who doubts that what Hasan did was terrorism? Of course,for the terrorist,what he does is soldiering for his cause. It is eternal war for the supremacy of Islam,not terrorism as such,and in the eyes of the jihadist,the enemy always has it coming. To the jihadist,it is no more terrorism than if a U.S. Marine fires on the enemy in battle. But why does the administration not see what Hasan did as terrorism? They had to call it something for public consumption,and since the president does not see a premeditated attack on his own unarmed service men and women in the global advancement of Islam as terrorism,it defaulted to “workplace violence”. Apparently terrorism is defined not by ideology or method,but by location. Still,to so blatantly lie about something so obvious,without the slightest concern over pushback by those who see the lie for what it is,or who suffer its ill effects,is passive aggression on steroids against America.
When the president picks who he will support and who he will condemn on the international stage,he consistently sides with those who hate the United States and the Judeo-Christian principles upon which it was founded. President Obama has willfully enabled Iran to develop a nuclear weapons program entirely without resistance,other than UN sanctions,which have failed. In Egypt,Mubarak’s faults were well documented,but so too were his assets in terms of peace and stability in the Middle East. Nevertheless,the president purposefully aided his overthrow in order to replace him with members of an organization,the Muslim Brotherhood,which collaborated with the Nazis and which has,at its core,goals and objectives that are antithetical to the security and safety of the United States.
Read More at American Thinker . By Jeffrey T. Brown.