Report: Majority Of Congress Now Millionaires





Photo credit: Jessie Owen (Creative Commons)

In today’s political climate, the only approval rating consistently lower than Barack Obama’s is that of America’s legislators. Often seen as ineffectual at best, voters of both parties agree Congress is in need of a shakeup.

While the upcoming midterm elections will allow citizens to directly send a message to current lawmakers, a recent report might give those engaged in the class war more ammunition to use against them. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, a majority of legislators currently have a net worth in excess of $1 million. The organization’s report, which used data from 2012, indicates this is the first time in American history that threshold has been met.

In the span of one year, 11 additional Congress members joined the millionaire club, the report stated, with 268 of 534 current lawmakers now qualifying.

Of course, financial success is a large part of the American Dream; however, that dream also includes the hard work necessary to earn that prosperity. In the eyes of millions of voters, too many congressmen and women have profited off of their position without offering any real service in exchange.

In reality, most of these elected officials were rich before taking office.

According to CRP Executive Director Sheila Krumholtz, Americans generally support wealthy candidates because those are the only individuals who can effectively establish their candidacy.

“Despite the fact that polls show how dissatisfied Americans are with Congress overall,” she said, “there’s been no change in our appetite to elect affluent politicians to represent our concerns in Washington. Of course, it’s undeniable that in our electoral system, candidates need access to wealth to run financially viable campaigns, and the most successful fundraisers are politicians who swim in those circles to begin with.”

Overall, the median net worth for legislators broke $1 million last year. Senators are much more likely to be wealthy, boasting a median net worth of $2.7 million – a $200,000 increase over 2011. Senate Democrats are worth less than their GOP counterparts, largely due to the absence of John Kerry and the deceased Frank Lautenberg. The two men boasted a combined net worth of more than $335 million.

In the House, the median was about $929,000 for Democrats and $884,000 for Republicans, for an average of $896,000.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), was the wealthiest legislator, according to the report, with a net worth of about $464 million. On the other end of the spectrum is another Republican representative, David Valadao of California, who is more than $12 million in the red.

While this report shines some light on the disparity between our elected leaders and many of their constituents, far fewer Americans begrudge success than leftists seem to believe. In reality, most voters are far more concerned with a politician’s voting record than his or her bank statement.

–B. Christopher Agee

Have an idea for a story? Email us at tips@westernjournalism.com

Photo credit: Jessie Owen (Creative Commons)





Do you have $25,000 in your IRA or 401(k)? This "Loophole" in IRS Code lets you move your savings to gold ... get this NO-COST Info Guide >

2 comments to Report: Majority Of Congress Now Millionaires

  • stevor

    Duh, insider trading was deemed legal for them so they were bought off by Wall Street and forever owned by the Globalists!

  • wildbill446

    I’ve said this before. Ever notice the politicians go in to Congress as Paupers and come out as millionaires. Most are Lawyers that couldn’t make it in private practice so they went into politics. When they make a mistake no one notices and they get a free pass. It seems when they enter Congress their first concern is for “reelection” next is how much money can I make. When asked what about the people, they answer “What people?”

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>