Watch: Boehner Just Surrendered To … Eric Holder

Days after Republicans in the chamber led a vote to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress, House Speaker John Boehner announced his intention to effectively neuter representatives hoping to enforce a real penalty against her.

Despite her consistent pattern of stonewalling investigators trying to get to the bottom of the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups, he indicated the House’s role in the Lerner ordeal is over.

Although House members are constitutionally permitted to make an arrest on such charges, Boehner explained this weekend that he is firmly against pursuing that option. Instead, he said in a Fox News interview Sunday, he wants to let Eric Holder be the sole arbiter of justice in the case.

“The contempt charge has gone to the attorney general,” he said, “and it’s up to the attorney general, Eric Holder, to prosecute this and to assign someone to prosecute the case.”

Of course, Boehner conceded that he is unsure whether the Justice Department, which has been accused countless times under Holder’s leadership of enforcing the law with a partisan bias, will vigorously pursue the case against Lerner.

“Now, will he do it?” Boehner asked. “We don’t know. But the ball is in his court.”

Interviewer Maria Bartiromo specifically asked him about the enforcement provisions afforded his chamber. Boehner’s response, though disjointed, revealed his clear opposition to pursuing Lerner’s arrest.

“There’s a provision in the Constitution that has never been used; and, uh, and so, that’s uh,” he began. “I’m not sure that we want to go down that path.”

His only identifiable argument against the action is that it would mark the first time the House has pursued it. Nevertheless, the provision exists for a specific reason; and, by the criteria of many experts, the Lerner case is one in which such a move would be warranted.

Nevertheless, Boehner has made his decision, conceding he has no idea why the House has never acted on its enforcement authority.

“I’m not the historian here,” he concluded, returning to his previous position that it has “never been used, and I’m not sure that it’s uh, uh, an appropriate way to go about this.”

If you think Boehner’s wrong, sign the petition to arrest Lois Lerner below.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/polls-and-petitions/arrest-lois-lerner-petition/

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Do you have $25,000 in your IRA or 401(k)? This "Loophole" in IRS Code lets you move your savings to gold ... get this NO-COST Info Guide >

3 comments to Watch: Boehner Just Surrendered To … Eric Holder

  • william

    ANOTHER EFFFFFFFIIIINNNNNGGGGGG WIMP with a suntan.

  • wildbill446

    Boehner already knew Holder was not going to do a thing. He is the Fox guarding the hen house. Obama is his savior and dictates to him what to do and what to ignore.

  • Carolyne

    I note that Boehner gave no reason why Congress will not direct that Lerner be arrested, just that it won’t be done. I’d like to know why. Everyone, including Boehner, knows that Eric Holder is part of Obama’s conspiracy and even appointed an Obama donor to “Investigate.” Long before any DOJ envestigation is done, Obama pronounced there is not a “Smidgen” of corruption at the IRS. How could he know that before the conclusion of the investigation. We all know the answer to that. The orders have come down from on high to find nothing, “Not even a smidgen of corruption,” at the IRS. How stupid does Boehner, Holder, Obama et al think we are?

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>