Expose Obama

Georgia’s Obama Eligibility Decision:Legally Incorrect And Ethically Indefensible

On February 3^rd a much anticipated decision was issued by Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi,recommending that Secretary of State Brian Kemp allow Barack Hussein Obama to appear on the state ballot as a candidate for President.

Given previous rulings by Judge Malihi in the Obama case,many had assumed things might go badly for the acting president. Yet the judge’s 10 page decision could hardly have done more to accommodate defendant Obama and his attorney,especially in light of their having ignored court orders,subpoenas and the hearing itself.

And many of those who have reviewed Judge Malihi’s decision find it to be supported by neither fact nor law.

Of the statements made by the judge in his decision,the following are among the most objectionable to legal observers:

1.) “This decision is entirely based on the law,as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing.” (page 3)

In actuality there was NO evidence “presented at the hearing,” in response to subpoenas or submitted pre-trial upon which Judge Malihi could base his decision,as Barack Obama provided nothing,either in documentary or verbal form. Yet Malihi states “the following FACTS are considered:1.) Mr. Obama was born in the United States;2.) Mr. Obama’s mother was a citizen of the United States at the time of his birth…” (my caps) (page 6)

From what evidence placed in the court record did Malihi obtain these “facts?” No one seems to know.

2.) “The Court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny [sic] persuasive.” (page 7)

Ankeny (misspelled throughout the decision by Malihi) was a 2009,Indiana case brought by two plaintiffs who claimed Obama was not qualified to be president on the same grounds as used by at least one plaintiff in the Georgia case—Obama was NOT a “natural born citizen” as required by Article ll,Section l of the US Constitution.

In deciding the case against the plaintiff Ankeny,the Indiana State Court made glaring errors both in statutory construction and by completely misinterpreting Minor v. Happersett,the 1875 Supreme Court case which defined “natural born citizen.” Yet in his own words,Judge Malihi finds the reasoning and decision of the Indiana state court “persuasive.”

3.) “For the purposes of this analysis,this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore,as discussed in Arkeny [sic],he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.” (page 10)

“This Court CONSIDERED?” When all is said and done,courts don’t “consider” rulings or decisions,they MAKE them! Why did Judge Malihi not state that he FOUND Obama to have been born in the United States? Why does he simply “consider” it? Was this his way of protecting or excusing himself for the complete lack of evidence upon which this “consideration” was based?

And why does Malihi find it necessary to wield the Ankeny case before him like a sword? Could it be that,as he possessed no evidence upon which a decision could honestly be made,he was in desperate need of some “legal” excuse—ANY legal excuse– to provide grounds for his “consideration?”

Had it been honestly delivered,Michael Malihi’s “decision” should have been phrased in the following manner:

This Court considers it OK that Barack Obama be included on the Georgia presidential primary ballot because I’ve heard that a judge in an Indiana state court thinks it’s alright.

Over the next days,“Coach is Right” (and Western Journalism) will present specifics of Judge Malihi’s decision in order to determine its legal authority and susceptibility to successful appeal. And Attorney Mark Hatfield has already declared his intention to appeal.

Who Else Will Challenge Obama’s Eligibility,If Not Us? Stand up and fight or we can lose this fight….
Eligibility Attorney:Obama Needs Impeaching One of the attorneys who argued before a Georgia judge…

Why Obama Desperately Wants A HUDNA (Muslim Fake Truce) With The Catholic Church

Catholic Bishops take note: It’s a HUDNA! Please don’t do it.

Barack Hussain Obama a man brought up in a Muslim tradition is trying to use a weapon against the Catholic Church as old as Islam itself. A Hudna is a tactical cease-fire designed to trick an enemy into dropping his guard so you can kill him while he sleeps.

Saddam’s thugs used it to prolong the battle over Falujah. They tricked George Bush into a hudna and used the time to rest and regroup.

The plan

Since Obama neither understands nor cares about Catholics he has been juggling the issue of force Catholic institutions to cover abortion and contraception as part of their employee health insurance plans.He was hoping the heretofore supine Catholic bishops would remain silent as they historically have when Democrats have assaulted religious liberties.

He was expecting the non-existent “outrage” over forcing Catholic pharmacists to sell RU486 pills. Why would he think otherwise? He has no genuine Catholics in his inner circle and in fact is taking advice on this crisis from a Protestant Minister who believes this is “so fixable” – if only the Catholics would just cave.

What’s on the table

In 2008 Obama won the Catholic vote by an impressive 54/45 margin. There was much rejoicing by the Left over the return of Catholic “sanity” after they had voted 52/47 for Bush in 2004.

A closer look at the 14 point swing shows why Obama and his CINOs (Catholics in Name Only) desperately want a hudna. Among actual Catholics those who attend mass weekly and heard the Bishops letter calling them to fight Obama,he lost 50/49. This may seem like a small margin but when juxtaposed with the overall results it is a 13 point swing against Obama.

Using the Notre Dame controversy as a measurement of Obama’s popularity among actual Catholics makes the situation crystal clear:By 45/37 they disapproved of inviting Obama to speak.

Since 45% of Catholics are regularly attending Mass the number of people who heard the letter numbers about 30 million. An eight point deficit among 30 million added to Obama’s other documented reelection problems elevates tricking the Catholic Bishops into this hudna to priority one.

A successful hudna will “calm” Catholics into believing that anything this Muslim trained president says will be honored once he is reelected.

“Muslims have every right to lie and to deceive their adversaries,and a promise made to a non-Muslim can be broken whenever necessary.”

Please don’t do it,bishops.

Catholic Bishops Fight Back Against Obama’s Contraception Mandate The Conference of Catholic Bishops has finally awakened and like…
The Fraud In The Straw Hat’s War On The Catholic Church by Kevin “Coach” Collins For discerning Roman Catholics,watching their…

A Veteran’s Letter To The Wall Street Journal

To:Bret Stephens
Deputy Editor;Wall Street Journal

Dear Bret,

I watched your segment on Israel &Iran on Fox this morning,and this email is NOT about that subject. I am writing you because you seem to be an intelligent,mature,and serious reporter.

I am a 20-year military service disabled vet,and I am completely baffled by something;I would VERY much like your input on this.

For the purpose of this email,imagine that I am representing MILLIONS of Americans who feel the pain and frustration I am feeling. Although I don’t deserve any special treatment for my disability,I DO feel for the sacrifice I made for our country. A decent reply to this email would be VERY much appreciated. I will forward it to the huge email base I have for this cause.

I will be VERY brief. Last week,the President of the United States and his dream team of attorneys were ordered and subpoenaed to appear at a court in Georgia to submit all the evidence that the judge asked for to prove Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot in Georgia for November 2012. The President refused the subpoena,the lawyers never showed up either,and ALL the evidence presented ONLY by the prosecuting attorneys (including VERY experienced and professional forensic experts) was SO compelling…..it boggled the imagination that the judge wouldn’t be influenced by the facts presented in the case.

To make a long story short-the hearing lasted one day-the judge then made his ruling;Obama is “COMPLETELY ELIGIBLE TO BE ON THE BALLOT AND THIS CASE IS OVER”. The day before the hearing,the Secretary of State was on the same page as the judge and publicly declared to Obama and his attorneys (quote un-quote) “Not showing up at this court will be at your peril”.

So,Bret,here’s my question that MILLIONS and MILLIONS of Americans like me are asking.

WHERE IN THE HELL IS THE PRESS WHEN THINGS LIKE THIS HAPPEN?

Is it NOT news when Obama is subpoenaed?
Is it NOT news when Obama doesn’t show up?
Why do we who question Obama’s eligibility (again in the MILLIONS) have to get ALL our news of these goings-on from ONE source (World Net Daily)?
How can a judge and a Secretary of State issue a threat like “at your peril”to the President….and it NOT be news?

I could go on ad nauseum,but you seem to be an intelligent,mature reporter….so I am asking from my heart…

WHERE ARE YOU?

Maybe you don’t cover the Presidential beat for the Wall Street Journal…..but SOMEBODY there does.

Are ALL you reporters from EVERY paper,news media,and TV station THREATENED by your Editors NOT to cover this story of eligibility from the beginning?

On March 1st,Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona will have a news conference (the press ALWAYS listens to Sheriff Joe normally when he says things of importance.) His year-long multi-task-force team of investigators will release all the information they have found out about Obama (birth,college,travel records,etc);this is all the stuff so-called “birthers”thrive on. I’m just wondering if we will have to read all about it at WorldNetDaily AGAIN?

I would REALLY like you to reply to my concerns above,Bret. MILLIONS of Americans are awaiting your reply.

One last word;I didn’t get spit on coming back from Southeast Asia at the San Francisco Airport back in the 70′s to have a President of the United States trample the Constitution &be a fraud,and to have it be hushed up by the American press. Maybe the President IS eligible to be in the Oval Office,but you know and I know that there are some serious pieces of information that the President is covering up. Otherwise,why would he have spent MILLIONS of dollars on attorneys these past 3 years to fight these fights. YOUR job and your fellow reporter’s job is to report these things,however ugly and tough. So the simple question is:

WHY DON’T YOU?

Remember what Woodward &Bernstein did about Nixon?

What happened to that investigative hunger?

Please reply,with honesty.

Cordially,

Gordon Smith
Medford,Oregon

‘Wall Street Journal’Reports Uptick In Circulation,Gains No. 1 Slot Jennifer Saba,EditorandPublisher.com NEW YORK The Wall Street…
Wall Street Journal Revs Up New York Times Rivalry It might be the last great American newspaper war. And…

Joe Arpaio Backed By ‘Tea Party’ Group

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio received 100,000 petition signatures from a “tea party”organization Wednesday afternoon supporting Arpaio’s investigation of President Barack Obama and denouncing the U.S. Department of Justice’s civil-rights investigation of Arpaio.

Darla Dawald,national coordinator of Grassfire Nation,said the petitions were meant to show support for Arpaio and to force the Department of Justice to release the findings of their investigation on Arpaio or stop altogether.

“We have seen a tremendous amount of Chicago-style bully tactics that have been used by the Department of Justice and (Attorney General) Eric Holder’s office and we’re not happy about what we are seeing,”Dawald said. “We are not happy that someone such as Sheriff Joe,who does his best to protect this great state and nation,is being subjected to these types of tactics.”

Dawald said the Department of Justice investigation,which accused Arpaio’s office of systemic violations of Latinos’rights,is politically motivated and compared it to a “witch hunt.”She said the group plans to bring the signatures from supporters around the country to the Department of Justice and to members of Congress next week.

Arpaio said the petition signatures were unexpected and that he appreciated the support as a motivating factor to continue working for citizens of Maricopa County.

Read More at AZ Central By Brennan Smith,azcentral.com

Tea Party Asks Sheriff Joe Arpaio To Investigate Obama Birth Certificate By Jerome Corsi WND has received an advance copy of…
Arpaio Gets Death Threats Over Obama Investigation Maverick Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio says his “Cold Case Posse”…

House Conservatives Support Obama’s Latest Stimulus

Since February of 2009 when President Barack Obama began his aggressive push for stimulus into the American economy,he focused on one core area — infrastructure.

In fact,in his stimulus speech before Congress in 2009,his States of the Union in 2010,2011,and 2012,and his Jobs Act speech of late 2011,the President repeated referred to spending government money to create jobs to fix America’s infrastructure.

Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH),leader of the Republican Study Committee,is confirmed to be leaning toward supporting the plan. His public pronouncements that he is leaning toward supporting the plan is leading House conservatives as a whole to support this new stimulus plan — a stimulus plan to create jobs fixing and expanding America’s infrastructure.

The plan will most likely necessitate a federal bailout of the Highway Trust Fund,which is typically funded through the gas tax and is used to pay for highway projects. But Obama’s new stimulus busts the cap on the trust fund and,like social security,gets into general fund money to pay for the spending binge.

With the House bill,as is typical of Barack Obama’s legislation,spending will outpace income over the next five years by $69.6 billion. Moreso,as is also typical of President Obama’s stimulus schemes,Washington would retain the bulk of control,even though the money would be going to state transportation projects. Federal strings and federal money will come with the legislation.

Rejecting The Keystone Pipeline Is An Act Of Insanity

President Obama’s rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico is an act of national insanity. It isn’t often that a president makes a decision that has no redeeming virtues and — beyond the symbolism — won’t even advance the goals of the groups that demanded it. All it tells us is that Obama is so obsessed with his reelection that,through some sort of political calculus,he believes that placating his environmental supporters will improve his chances.

Aside from the political and public relations victory,environmentalists won’t get much. Stopping the pipeline won’t halt the development of tar sands,to which the Canadian government is committed;therefore,there will be little effect on global-warming emissions. Indeed,Obama’s decision might add to them. If Canada builds a pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific for export to Asia,moving all that oil across the ocean by tanker will create extra emissions. There will also be the risk of added spills.

Now consider how Obama’s decision hurts the United States. For starters,it insults and antagonizes a strong ally;getting future Canadian cooperation on other issues will be harder. Next,it threatens a large source of relatively secure oil that,combined with new discoveries in the United States,could reduce (though not eliminate) our dependence on insecure foreign oil.

Finally,Obama’s decision forgoes all the project’s jobs. There’s some dispute over the magnitude. Project sponsor TransCanada claims 20,000,split between construction (13,000) and manufacturing (7,000) of everything from pumps to control equipment. Apparently,this refers to “job years,” meaning one job for one year. If so,the actual number of jobs would be about half that spread over two years. Whatever the figure,it’s in the thousands and thus important in a country hungering for work. And Keystone XL is precisely the sort of infrastructure project that Obama claims to favor.

The big winners are the Chinese. They must be celebrating their good fortune and wondering how the crazy Americans could repudiate such a huge supply of nearby energy. There’s no guarantee that tar-sands oil will go to China;pipelines to the Pacific would have to be built. But it creates the possibility when the oil’s natural market is the United States.

There are three things to remember about Keystone and U.S. energy policy.

First,we’re going to use lots of oil for a long time. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that U.S. oil consumption will increase 4 percent between 2009 and 2035. The increase occurs despite highly optimistic assumptions about vehicle fuel efficiency and bio-fuels. But a larger population (390 million in 2035 versus 308 million in 2009) and more driving per vehicle offset savings.

The more oil we produce domestically and import from neighbors,the more we’re insulated from dramatic interruptions of global supplies. After the United States,Canada is the most dependable source of oil — or was,until Obama’s decision.

Second,barring major technological breakthroughs,emissions of carbon dioxide,the main greenhouse gas,will rise for similar reasons. The EIA projects that America’s CO2 emissions will increase by 16 percent from 2009 to 2035. (The EIA is updating its projections,but the main trends aren’t likely to change dramatically.) Stopping Canadian tar-sands development,were that possible,wouldn’t affect these emissions.

Finally,even if — as Keystone critics argue — some Canadian oil were refined in the United States and then exported,this would be a good thing. The exports would probably go mostly to Latin America. They would keep well-paid industrial jobs (yes,refining) in the United States and reduce our trade deficit in oil,which exceeded $300 billion in 2011.

By law,Obama’s decision was supposed to reflect “the national interest.” His standard was his political interest. The State Department had spent three years evaluating Keystone and appeared ready to approve the project by year-end 2011. Then the administration,citing opposition to the pipeline’s route in Nebraska,reversed course and postponed a decision to 2013 — after the election.

Now,reacting to a congressional deadline to decide,Obama rejected the proposal. But he also suggested that a new application with a modified Nebraska route — already being negotiated — might be approved,after the election. So the sop tossed to the environmentalists could be temporary. The cynicism is breathtaking.

Robert Samuelson is a columnist for the Washington Post and author of “The Great Inflation and Its Aftermath:The Past and Future of American Affluence.”

Shocked That Obama Rejected Keystone XL Pipeline? We’re about as shocked at Obama’s anti-energy decision as Claude…
Keystone Pipeline …Continue to Post…

What Do Some Of The Presidential Candidates Lack?

It seems to me that what is missing in the top two contenders for the Republican presidential nomination is passion.

While Ron Paul speaks with passion of the Federal Reserve and Rick Santorum speaks with passion about life,Newt Gingrich speaks passionately mostly about Mitt Romney;and Mitt,it seems,merely speaks in sound bites.

I don’t know about you,but I want to see them seek to build their own shining city on a hill such as that my dad envisioned,and not simply attempt to recreate that vision and make it their own..

I want them to stop speaking merely in sound bites,but rather to speak to me in parables to which I can relate. I want to feel their speeches,not just hear them. It needs to be more than “I’m not Mitt,”or “I can beat Obama.”I want them to convince me they really mean what they say,not what they think I want to hear.

If indeed Newt and Mitt can find the passion of Rick Santorum,and even that of my dad,they will go a long way towards winning not only the Republican nomination,but also the presidency itself. As many readers know,I have endorsed Newt and traveled with him on the campaign trail as a private citizen,but he can do better in this respect.

We Americans prefer to hear the real truth,not what politicians want us to hear. In the era of Barack Obama the message we hear from Washington is,“Trust me,we know what is good for you.”

That’s the message of tyrants,as many who lived under Hitler and Mussolini discovered as they were herded into concentration camps.

In those dreadful times,Germans,Italians and others under their rule were fed slogans such as those seen on signs above the entrances of concentration camps:“Arbeit Makt Frei —Work Makes Freedom.”To the Nazis and Fascists,freedom and death and work and slavery were conflated with respect to individuals;all that mattered was the state.

One of the early signs of an incoming dictatorship is a government’s attack on the Christian church. Tragically,we are beginning to see something like that now,in the Army’s attempt to censor chaplains —to tell them what they can or cannot say in their sermons.

The government in this case appears to believe that it is superior to any religion —that it is entitled to overrule the doctrines of faith by which all legitimate religious organizations live. We must,in their view,submit our articles of faith for government review and tolerance.

Accept this and bid freedom of religion farewell. Let’s find the passion to make Obama a one-term president.

Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan,a political consultant,and the author of “The New Reagan Revolution”(St. Martin’s Press,2011). He is the founder and chairman of The Reagan Group and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Visit his website at www.reagan.com,or e-mail comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com.

Presidential Candidates:Better Find Those Birth Certificates! And then there were 11. The push at the state…
State Representatives File Birth Certificate Bill Filed For Presidential Candidates A state representative on Tuesday filed a bill that would…

Five Democratic ‘Super’ PACs May Seek Joint Operation

WASHINGTON — Five Democratic “super”political action committees are reaching out to party mega-donors seeking $1 million to $10 million contributions,now that President Barack Obama has blessed the outside spending group working to get him re-elected.

Discussions among the five super PACs are under way about setting up a joint fundraising committee,said Bill Burton,a former deputy White House press secretary and co-founder of Priorities USA Action,which was launched last spring to help Obama win a second term.

“We’re in serious talks,”Burton told iWatch News of the Center for Public Integrity,but he added that a final decision hasn’t been made about establishing a joint fundraising mechanism. Either way,“there are a lot of people in the progressive donor community who have not yet gotten involved who are likely to be involved.”

Other top Democratic fundraisers say that a joint fundraising entity is likely and stress that the White House’s abrupt shift on super PACs — which came Monday in a conference call to leading donors and fundraisers with campaign manager Jim Messina — could help prod large donors to write seven-figure checks.

Democratic fundraisers are hoping that several major donors such as Hollywood mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg and Chicago media executive Fred Eychaner,both of whom already have written large checks to Priorities USA Action,will pony up considerably more to a joint committee.

Read More at McClatchyDC By Peter Stone,McClatchyDC

No related posts.

Radio Host Unloads On Romney

Right-leaning radio host Mark Levin launched a scathing attack on Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney today,labeling the former Massachusetts governor “sleazy” and “poisonous.”

On his Facebook page today,Levin tells Romney,“Conservatives have had enough of your sleazy campaign tactics.”

Levin pointed to a CNN report,which noted that in the wake of Rick Santorum’s three-state sweep yesterday in presidential primaries and caucuses,Romney would be taking a tougher approach with the former Pennsylvania senator,looking to paint him as a Washington insider.

Read More at WND By Joe Kovacs,WorldNetDaily

Radio Host Destroys Romney Mouthpiece Mitt Romney was scheduled to be in studio with Ray…
Did Muslim Lobby Force Firing Of Popular Radio Host? Washington,D.C. radio station WMAL is once again being accused…

Turnout Proves That Mitt Really Did Scorch The Earth

The real story of the three results from Tuesday night is not that Rick Santorum picked up some wins —though that is big. No,the real story is that three states held votes and nobody came. Almost nobody,that is. Consider that the total turnout for Missouri,Colorado,and Minnesota combined was barely over half of the turnout of South Carolina alone and —worse yet —barely over half the turnout for the same three states in 2008.

Thus,after South Carolina’s record-setting primary turnout,the Republican Party has now seen a total of five events in a row where turnout was down compared to 2008. This includes the three events from this week along with Nevada and Florida.

Yes,something has made Republicans less excited about beating Barack Obama than they were about John McCain maybe replacing George W. Bush. Who knew that was even possible?

What gives?

The answer is fairly clear. The candidates have forgotten about Obama. What has turned folks off is Mitt Romney’s scorched-earth campaign,which has managed to unfortunately suck all the rest of the candidates into a circular firing squad of a childish food-fight that is of zero interest to the Republican base voter.