September 7th, 2010
Kevin “Coach” Collins, Coach Is Right

A spokeswoman for the Treasury Department insists “No American taxpayer funds will be used to support [a] Kabul Bank.” Let’s hope this is one promise from these people we can count on because there will be serious consequences if Obama reverses himself.
The banks in Afghanistan must be controlled by the United States or our allies so they do not fall under the influence of the Taliban who will use sharia law to run them instead of accepted banking principles. Under sharia the terrorist Taliban will pull out 2.5% of every dollar handled by Afghanistan’s banks.
What Shari’a banks would look like
Shari’a banks run on the principles of Islam in every single aspect of their activities.
These banks would; charge no interest; avoid any speculative transactions; introduce and collect the Islamic tax called zakat and; discourage any production of tangible assets offensive to Islamic values.
In its purest state Islam is a huge redistribution scheme under which the zakat serves as a way to extract money from faithful Muslims to create the image of being a charitable religion. There is no choice for adherent Muslims when it comes to paying their zakat. Its monitory nature means a zakat can not justifiably be called an act of charity. Since zakat is 2.5% of a Muslim’s annual wages, lots of dollars would pass through Islamist bankers’ hands which would turn them into paymasters of terror.
The men who would be Afghanistan’s banking advisory board….
Read more
Tags: Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Sharia Law, Taliban Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
September 7th, 2010
Dr. Paul Kengor, The Center for Vision and Values

I got the email in late afternoon. “In a major liberal initiative to curtail discussion of President Obama’s religious identity,” the email began, “over 70 Christian leaders and denominational heads have signed a letter saying that questions about the religious philosophy of the president of the United States should be ignored and suppressed by the major media.”
This couldn’t be correct. No doubt another internet hoax by the vast right-wing conspiracy. I wasn’t taking the bait.
Rather than hit delete, however, I took a moment to open the hyperlink. Lo and behold, the letter (click here), signed by over 70 self-described “Christian pastors and leaders,” proclaimed:
[W]e are deeply troubled by the recent questioning of President Obama’s faith…. [T]he personal faith of our leaders should not be up for public debate…. Therefore, we urge public officials, faith leaders, and the media to offer no further support or airtime to those who misrepresent and call into question the president’s Christian faith.
Likewise remarkable was the letter’s appeal to political neutrality. “This is not a political issue,” the pastors insisted.
The letter was posted at the website of Eleison Group, whose president, Burns Strider, offers faith-based political advice to Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi. Signers include Jim Wallis, who is synonymous with faith and politics, widely known for his group Sojourners and bestseller God’s Politics.
Most striking is the letter’s stunning demand that the media offer no airtime to anyone questioning the president’s faith, even as this president has arguably the most unconventional faith profile of any president in history, understandably creating confusion among the public.
No airtime? Obviously, such a demand presents a host of thorny considerations, beginning, of course, with the First Amendment.
Read more.
Tags: Barack Obama, Islam, Islamic President, Jim Wallis, Religion, Religious Left Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
September 7th, 2010
The Daily Caller

Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson is the author of the new book, Conduct Unbecoming: How Barack Obama is Destroying the Military and Endangering Our Security, to be released on Sept. 7.
During his 20 years on active duty, the former lieutenant colonel participated in combat operations in Grenada, Somalia, Rwanda, Haiti, and Bosnia, and as senior military aide to President Bill Clinton, was responsible for the “Nuclear Football.” Since retiring from the Air Force in 2001, Patterson has authored two New York Times bestsellers, Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America’s National Security and Reckless Disregard: How Liberal Democrats Undercut Our Military, Endanger Our Soldiers, and Jeopardize Our Security.
Patterson recently agreed to answer eight questions from The Daily Caller about his new book:
1) Why did you decide to write this book?
I wrote my first book, Dereliction of Duty, detailing my experiences working as a military aide at the side of President Bill Clinton as a warning from a commissioned military officer to his nation. I was an eyewitness to the contempt the Clintons had for the military, his indifference to national security issues except insofar as they served his own political and personal purposes and his failures to accept his responsibilities as our commander in chief. As I outlined in Dereliction of Duty, I lay the blame for the attacks of September 11, 2001 fully at the feet of Bill Clinton, and I felt an obligation to tell that story.
Now, I see history repeating itself in the presidency of Barack Obama. Only this time the misconduct and the dereliction of duty of Obama and his administration could lead to far worse devastation than we suffered in the wake of Clinton and 9/11. I wrote my new book – Conduct Unbecoming: How Barack Obama is Destroying the Military and Endangering Our Security – because I’ve seen this all before only this time it’s worse, much worse. Our nation and our military deserve so much more, so much better. I believe Obama’s foreign policy record so far and his agenda for the future are extremely deleterious to our national security, and need to be reversed in the elections of November 2010 and 2012.
2) Did you expect President Obama to do better on national security matters than you believe he has to date?
I certainly hoped he would be better then he has been to date. From my perspective as a military analyst, it seems that a unifying theme of Democrat Presidents Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama, is a consistent underestimating of foreign policy dangers. Obama appears to believe that by the sheer force of his own personality and his serial apologies for the behavior of his predecessor he can encourage our enemies to drop their hostility towards us. So far, that doesn’t seem to be working and he seems to be failing miserably. In fact, if anything, his performance to date seems to have only increased our enemies’ contempt for us as is seen in the dismissive reactions of Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez.
I also hoped he would be a strong commander in chief, a leader worthy of our military, and one that not only empathized with our servicemen and women but actually understood them. Quite frankly, to this point he doesn’t seem to have a clue as to what it means to lead the nation or our armed forces during wartime. In fact, he is only the second American president in the last sixty years not to have served in the armed forces, the other being Bill Clinton, and it shows. He’s a politician, a “community organizer,” who now commands the greatest and most powerful military in the world and he seems very uncomfortable with that responsibility.
As someone who used to train Air Force officers, I would judge him, from his public record, as someone unqualified to command even a squadron of a few hundred airmen – that is if he’d ever considered serving his nation as an Air Force officer, which of course, he never did. He’s in way over his head and it shows. When the airmen and the privates in the trenches can see it, and they do, he has some serious leadership challenges that, so far, he has failed to meet.
3) Your book discusses how President Obama and his administration have failed to appropriately identify the enemy America is fighting. How so and how do you think this has affected our global fight against Islamist extremism?
You can’t win a war if you’re unwilling or unable to identify the enemy. We have a president that, during the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, wanted to kick the “ass” of British Petroleum but doesn’t want to kick the ass of an ideological enemy sworn to defeat us, which murders innocents and suppresses human rights around the globe. Obama has a thin skin. He has shown a tendency to lash out angrily at his opponents — Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, Tea Partiers, BP, Republicans, “fat cats” on Wall Street, and the state of Arizona, to name a few. But when it comes to identifying America’s real enemies — the ones fighting and killing Americans every day — he just can’t muster an interest in the fight.
When Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan shot forty-three fellow soldiers, killing thirteen and wounding thirty, at Fort Hood, Texas while shouting “Allahu Akbar,” Obama could only surmise that it was a “senseless act of violence.” The Department of Defense’s 86-page report following the massacre did not contain a single reference to “Islam,” “Muslim,” “Sharia,” or “Koran” although Major Hasan had a history of making anti-American statements based on his radical Islamic beliefs and is a known follower of Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, himself an American terrorist inciting jihad from his hole in Yemen.
The Pentagon’s 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, the 128-page report that lays out America’s future military strategy and the force structure necessary to fight the nation’s wars, contains not a single mention of “Islam,” “Islamic,” or “Islamist.” Similarly, the Obama administration’s official National Security Strategy released in May, 2010 targets “climate change” as a national security priority, while making no references to radical Islamic terrorism.
How can you win a war when you are unwilling to identify the enemy? The simple answer is: you can’t.
Read more.
Tags: Barack Obama, Foreign Policy, Military Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
September 7th, 2010
Tags: unemployment Posted in Cartoons | 1 Comment »
September 6th, 2010
Tags: economic crisis Posted in Cartoons | No Comments »
September 3rd, 2010
Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports

The organization that brought Barack Obama to Chicago as a “community organizer” is ready to launch a new voter registration drive. Voters have reason for concern, since the organization often hires ACORN members to perform its registrations, its activities have been investigated by the FBI, and its board members include one of the originators of the Cloward-Piven strategy.
Voting For America, “an affiliate of the voting rights nonprofit Project Vote,” plans to “help” more than 50,000 students in seven states register to vote. The Sierra Club has contracted VFA to perform the drive on its behalf.
The states targeted are such battlegrounds as Ohio, Colorado, Nevada, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Oregon. Each state high-profile elections looming in November.
Executive director Michael Slater said Project Vote created VFA this year “as a means of making the systems, strategies, and tools we’ve developed available to other organizations.”
Share the stealth.
Among the “services” VFA “will contribute” are “legal services,” presumably when its registration cards are challenged in court. Their history assures they will be.
Voter Fraud
The FBI investigated Project Vote and ACORN as part of its inquiry into the massive registration of non-existent voters. Judicial Watch obtained handwritten notes FBI officers took during interviews with the staff. (The two work in close tandem.)
One interviewee told the FBI, “Project Vote will pay” six dollars per voting card, “fake or not.” Why would the group want fraudulent cards? Thankfully, the interrogators literally spelled their reasons out, in longhand (and I quote):
Read more.
Tags: Acorn, Barack Obama, Cloward-Piven Strategy, Democratic Party, ineligible voters, Marilyn Katz, Project Vote, Radical Left, Valerie Jarrett, voter fraud Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
September 3rd, 2010
Michelle Malkin, MichelleMalkin.com

To mark Labor Day 2010, President Obama will join hands with AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in Milwaukee and pose as champions of the working class. Bad move. Trumka’s organizing record is a shameful reminder of the union movement’s violent and corrupt foundations.
The new Obama/AFL-CIO power alliance — underwritten with $40 million in hard-earned worker dues — is a midterm shotgun marriage of Beltway brass knuckles and Big Labor brawn. Trumka warmed up his rhetorical muscles this past week with full-frontal attacks on former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. He indignantly accused her of “getting close to calling for violence” and suggested that her criticism of Tea Party-bashing labor bosses amounted to “terrorizing” workers.
Trumka and Obama will cast Big Labor as an unassailable force for good in American history. But when it comes to terrorizing workers, Trumka knows whereof he speaks.
Meet Eddie York. He was a workingman whose story will never scroll across Obama’s teleprompter. A nonunion contractor who operated heavy equipment, York was shot to death during a strike called by the United Mine Workers 17 years ago. Workmates who tried to come to his rescue were beaten in an ensuing melee. The head of the UMW spearheading the wave of strikes at that time? Richard Trumka.
Read more.
Tags: Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Politics, Richard Trumka, Unions, Violence Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »
September 3rd, 2010
Thom Redmond, WorldNetDaily.

A career officer in the U.S. Army acting as a judge in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin today ruled that the military is no place for Barak Obama’s presidential eligibility to be evaluated.
Army Col. Denise R. Lind today ruled in a hearing regarding the evidence to be allowed in the scheduled October court-martial of Lakin that he will be denied access to any of Obama’s records as well as any testimony from those who may have access to the records.
With her decision, Lind mirrored a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs’ access to any requested documentation regarding the president’s eligibility.
Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.
Paul Rolf Jensen, Lakin’s civilian attorney, said the case would continue. But he said the courts now have denied his client the opportunity to present his defense.
Jensen had argued that under U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant put on court martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his or her defense.
Lind, who took 40 minutes to read her decision to the court, disagreed.
She said opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president, and it’s up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.
Read more.
Tags: Barack Obama, Eligibility, LTC Lakin, Obama Birth Certificate, Terrence Lakin Posted in Uncategorized | 40 Comments »
|